View As One PageView As Slideshow

floateron:

frozenfontana:

iaintnopapaya:

Disney Princesses as sloths.

but why

why not

(via ruinedchildhood)

View As One PageView As Slideshow

i-am-of-asgard:

This actually makes sense

your move america 

(Source: aimless99, via bloodmachine)

maja-stina:

fandomsandfeminism:

generalmaluga:

albinwonderland:

fandomsandfeminism:

betterthanabortion:

"My body, my choice" only makes sense when someone else’s life isn’t at stake.

Fun fact: If my younger sister was in a car accident and desperately needed a blood transfusion to live, and I was the only person on Earth who could donate blood to save her, and even though donating blood is a relatively easy, safe, and quick procedure no one can force me to give blood. Yes, even to save the life of a fully grown person, it would be ILLEGAL to FORCE me to donate blood if I didn’t want to.
See, we have this concept called “bodily autonomy.” It’s this….cultural notion that a person’s control over their own body is above all important and must not be infringed upon. 
Like, we can’t even take LIFE SAVING organs from CORPSES unless the person whose corpse it is gave consent before their death. Even corpses get bodily autonomy. 
To tell people that they MUST sacrifice their bodily autonomy for 9 months against their will in an incredibly expensive, invasive, difficult process to save what YOU view as another human life (a debatable claim in the early stages of pregnancy when the VAST majority of abortions are performed) is desperately unethical. You can’t even ask people to sacrifice bodily autonomy to give up organs they aren’t using anymore after they have died. 
You’re asking people who can become pregnant to accept less bodily autonomy than we grant to dead bodies. 

reblogging for commentary 

But, assuming the mother wasn’t raped, the choice to HAVE a baby and risk sacrificing their “bodily autonomy” is a choice that the mother made. YOu don’t have to have sex with someone. Cases of rape aside, it isn’t ethical to say abortion is justified. The unborn baby has rights, too. 

First point: Bodily autonomy can be preserved, even if another life is dependent on it. See again the example about the blood donation. 
And here’s another point: When you say that “rape is the exception” you betray something FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN about your own argument.
Because a fetus produced from sexual assault is biologically NO DIFFERENT than a fetus produced from consensual sex. No difference at all.
If one is alive, so is the other. If one is a person, so is the other. If one has a soul, then so does the other. If one is a little blessing that happened for a reason and must be protected, then so is the other. 
When you say that “Rape is the exception” what you betray is this: It isn’t about a life. This isn’t about the little soul sitting inside some person’s womb, because if it was you wouldn’t care about HOW it got there, only that it is a little life that needs protecting.
When you say “rape is the exception” what you say is this: You are treating pregnancy as a punishment. You are PUNISHING people who have had CONSENSUAL SEX but don’t want to go through a pregnancy. People who DARED to have consensual sex without the goal of procreation in mind, and this is their “consequence.” 
And that is gross. 

This has been added to since I last saw it, so reblogging again.

maja-stina:

fandomsandfeminism:

generalmaluga:

albinwonderland:

fandomsandfeminism:

betterthanabortion:

"My body, my choice" only makes sense when someone else’s life isn’t at stake.

Fun fact: If my younger sister was in a car accident and desperately needed a blood transfusion to live, and I was the only person on Earth who could donate blood to save her, and even though donating blood is a relatively easy, safe, and quick procedure no one can force me to give blood. Yes, even to save the life of a fully grown person, it would be ILLEGAL to FORCE me to donate blood if I didn’t want to.

See, we have this concept called “bodily autonomy.” It’s this….cultural notion that a person’s control over their own body is above all important and must not be infringed upon. 

Like, we can’t even take LIFE SAVING organs from CORPSES unless the person whose corpse it is gave consent before their death. Even corpses get bodily autonomy. 

To tell people that they MUST sacrifice their bodily autonomy for 9 months against their will in an incredibly expensive, invasive, difficult process to save what YOU view as another human life (a debatable claim in the early stages of pregnancy when the VAST majority of abortions are performed) is desperately unethical. You can’t even ask people to sacrifice bodily autonomy to give up organs they aren’t using anymore after they have died. 

You’re asking people who can become pregnant to accept less bodily autonomy than we grant to dead bodies. 

reblogging for commentary 

But, assuming the mother wasn’t raped, the choice to HAVE a baby and risk sacrificing their “bodily autonomy” is a choice that the mother made. YOu don’t have to have sex with someone. Cases of rape aside, it isn’t ethical to say abortion is justified. The unborn baby has rights, too. 

First point: Bodily autonomy can be preserved, even if another life is dependent on it. See again the example about the blood donation. 

And here’s another point: When you say that “rape is the exception” you betray something FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN about your own argument.

Because a fetus produced from sexual assault is biologically NO DIFFERENT than a fetus produced from consensual sex. No difference at all.

If one is alive, so is the other. If one is a person, so is the other. If one has a soul, then so does the other. If one is a little blessing that happened for a reason and must be protected, then so is the other. 

When you say that “Rape is the exception” what you betray is this: It isn’t about a life. This isn’t about the little soul sitting inside some person’s womb, because if it was you wouldn’t care about HOW it got there, only that it is a little life that needs protecting.

When you say “rape is the exception” what you say is this: You are treating pregnancy as a punishment. You are PUNISHING people who have had CONSENSUAL SEX but don’t want to go through a pregnancy. People who DARED to have consensual sex without the goal of procreation in mind, and this is their “consequence.” 

And that is gross. 

This has been added to since I last saw it, so reblogging again.

(via aydreeahnah)

malfoysotter:

frozenpeaness:

malfoysotter:

there are 13 yr olds on this website who are genuinely like “YAAAAS BENEDICT PUT UR DICK IN ME MAKE ME UR CUMBERBITCH AND CUMBERCUM ON MY FAAAACE” like im so worried about them

Oh like you weren’t the same way when you were 13?

literally no i never wanted to fuck a 1000 year old alien even at 13

(via bloodmachine)

waggington:

some people are afraid of dogs but i’m afraid of the opposite of dogs. the absence of dogs. dogless space

(via aydreeahnah)

View As One PageView As Slideshow

The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime.

(

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

except as punishment for a crime.

Think about who’s in jail and why. 

(via amerikkkan-stories)

and that “crime” could be anything they felt like charging you with

(via boygeorgemichaelbluth)

This was how the myth of Black criminality started, for the record. After the abolition of slavery, a lot of states made laws targeting Black people specifically, and then put them on chain gangs to get free labor from them.

Oh, and the US is still disproportionately incarcerating Black people and private prisons are making huge amounts off them.

(via bunnybotbaby)

This is one of those pieces of information I wish had like 200 million notes on tumblr.

(via kenobi-wan-obi)

meanwhile the dea teamed up with the cca

(via cxnfvsed-and-cxnflicted)

Yeah, I believe that black people are twice as likely to be arrested and convicted for committing the same crimes as a white person. Draw your own conclusions.

(via yesiamtheblack)

Reblogging this because everytime in real life I’ve said Slavery didn’t really end I’ve been dismissed as crazy.

(via locsgirl)

I’ll reblog this every time it comes up on my dash. People need to know!

(via andshegotthegirl)

(via rainbowraconteur)

)

dormtainment:

shizukasmack:

dear-white-people:

Two years ago we made a fake trailer for a movie we WANTED to make. And TODAY thanks to you guys, the OFFICIAL TEASER TRAILER for that movie is here! You did this. Your support and love brought the smart black movie genre back from the dead and into theaters this OCTOBER 17TH!!

WATCH, LIKE, SHARE, REPEAT!

Yes!

First of all.

HELL YEAH TO THIS MOVIE.

Now the un-fun part.

The un-fun has begun.

Aiight so,

It’s obvious this movie will use Youtube as a way to connect to fans of its release…

We here at Dormtainment have been on Youtube for years. Personally, It has given me the skill to kind of “read” the reaction a video has just by the like bar.

Now…

I want you guys to watch how aggressively this movie is disliked on Youtube…

And the dislike bar ratio in comparison to other videos…

And look at why it’s disliked…

And on what channels its more aggressively disliked…

Feels racial right?

Most modern racism is hidden in subtleties and systems. Youtube provides a platform for the common man to openly express, and even get “likes”, for his/her gross, smelly, probably hairy racist views.

Youtube has its own brand of rampant racism that is only a piece of the widespread racism that the internet is known for.

As Youtube has grown to have more of a “mainstream” audience, you get to see more regular people (AKA people who don’t live on the internet) commenting. This means you’ll read a HEAP of common place, logical, genuinely racist opinions from real people. Across da globe!

(I will write more about Youtube’s expression of racism soon…)

A movie that speaks to race in the title (especially with black people in the thumbnail) will definitely be watched, followed, and attacked               * disappointingly-looks-at-the-camera.gif * on the internet .

My main point is, if you’re a fan of the idea of this movie like I am, you should learn how to read, understand, and not internalize the racist comments you’ll see.

DO: Like and recommend the video and film. It’s your best way of stickin’ it to the man…

DON’T: Get into essay long arguments in a Youtube comment section. I don’t know if you can get into healthy debates on that platform…

DO: Skim through and read those ignorant comments. Even stupidity has something to teach…

DON’T: Read too much of it. Seriously. It’ll mess you up bad.

DO: Try Butter Pecan Syrup. It’s bomb on pancakes.

Or, do all that stuff and don’t try the syrup. I aint got the answers Sway. I’m just sayin watch out, because if you’re not used to internet racism, you surely will be if you follow this film.

-Tay

(via rainbowraconteur)

constantneverland:

namastetoyoutoo:

This is by far my favorite tweet ever.

Preach.

constantneverland:

namastetoyoutoo:

This is by far my favorite tweet ever.

Preach.

(via bloodmachine)